↓ Skip to main content

BCG immunotherapy for bladder cancer—the effects of substrain differences

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Urology, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
BCG immunotherapy for bladder cancer—the effects of substrain differences
Published in
Nature Reviews Urology, September 2013
DOI 10.1038/nrurol.2013.194
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Genetic mutations have been progressively introduced to BCG by repeated serial passage over many decades of its culture and global dissemination. Thus, marked differences exist in the phenotype, antigenicity, reactogenicity, and clinical characteristics of the numerous substrains of BCG currently in use for bladder cancer immunotherapy. These differences influence proposed mycobacterial antitumour mechanisms and toxicity, potentially resulting in variations in clinical efficacy and adverse effects. However, although there is evidence of substrain-related differences in the clinical efficacy of BCG as a tuberculosis vaccine, evidence of an effect on bladder cancer immunotherapy remains elusive, owing to the lack of appropriately powered head-to-head comparative clinical trials, the nonstandardization of BCG manufacture, and variation in treatment protocols--possibly itself a response to underlying substrain differences. Advances in our understanding of mycobacterial genetics, structure and function, and host-pathogen interactions might explain differences in clinical practice and outcomes. These advances are guiding the identification of biomarkers for reactogenicity and efficacy, and the rational design of immunotherapeutic strategies to eliminate the use of live bacilli for bladder cancer therapy.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 15%
Student > Master 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 21 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 28 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2018.
All research outputs
#20,439,914
of 31,814,824 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Urology
#1,495
of 2,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,192
of 233,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Urology
#13
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,814,824 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,299 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.