↓ Skip to main content

Does vitamin C act as a pro‐oxidant under physiological conditions?

Overview of attention for article published in FASEB Journal, June 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
14 Wikipedia pages
reddit
8 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
495 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Does vitamin C act as a pro‐oxidant under physiological conditions?
Published in
FASEB Journal, June 1999
DOI 10.1096/fasebj.13.9.1007
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Vitamin C readily scavenges reactive oxygen and nitrogen species and may thereby prevent oxidative damage to important biological macromolecules such as DNA, lipids, and proteins. Vitamin C also reduces redox active transition metal ions in the active sites of specific biosynthetic enzymes. The interaction of vitamin C with 'free', catalytically active metal ions could contribute to oxidative damage through the production of hydroxyl and alkoxyl radicals; whether these mechanisms occur in vivo, however, is uncertain. To examine this issue, we reviewed studies that investigated the role of vitamin C, both in the presence and absence of metal ions, in oxidative DNA, lipid, and protein damage. We found compelling evidence for antioxidant protection of lipids by vitamin C in biological fluids, animals, and humans, both with and without iron cosupplementation. Although the data on protein oxidation in humans are sparse and inconclusive, the available data in animals consistently show an antioxidant role of vitamin C. The data on vitamin C and DNA oxidation in vivo are inconsistent and conflicting, but some of the discrepancies can be explained by flaws in experimental design and methodology. These and other important issues discussed here need to be addressed in future studies of the role of vitamin C in oxidative damage.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 495 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Jordan 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 474 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 71 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 12%
Student > Bachelor 53 11%
Researcher 51 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 5%
Other 87 18%
Unknown 149 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 101 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 61 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 9%
Chemistry 37 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 23 5%
Other 71 14%
Unknown 158 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2026.
All research outputs
#1,063,393
of 34,365,356 outputs
Outputs from FASEB Journal
#384
of 14,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#489
of 52,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from FASEB Journal
#1
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,365,356 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 52,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.