↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Yeast-based attract-and-kill strategies for Drosophila suzukii management without disrupting honey bee activity
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2025
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0323653
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Attract-and-kill strategies are effective, sustainable pest control methods. Formulations combining the insecticide spinosad, at a lower dose than conventional methods, with the Drosophila-associated yeast Hanseniaspora uvarum have shown promising results. Recently, Saccharomycopsis vini was identified as the most attractive yeast for ovipositing females. In this study, the potential of S. vini for use in attract-and-kill formulations against D. suzukii was evaluated alongside H. uvarum. Behavioural assays demonstrated that D. suzukii preferred S. vini when both yeasts are simultaneously present in a close range setting but was attracted to both in long range attraction assays. In efficacy assays, S. vini and H. uvarum were equally efficient at reducing oviposition and increasing mortality in formulation with spinosad. Offering yeast formulations at the foraging sites of trained honey bees did not stimulate more feeding when compared to sugar syrup. The characterisation of the organic volatile compounds released from the cultures demonstrated that S. vini and H. uvarum were composed of overlapping as well as distinct chemicals. The antennally active compounds ethyl acetate and ethyl propanoate were abundant in the more attractive S. vini and H. uvarum, while the compounds 3-methyl-1-butanol and 2-methylthiolan-3-one were more abundant in the less attractive S. cerevisiae. These chemicals may be further studied as possible attractants or repellents for D. suzukii. We propose S. vini as a new yeast with potential for use in integrated pest management, with a distinctive volatile profile while maintaining a similar efficacy compared to H. uvarum against D. suzukii. Neither H. uvarum nor S. vini stimulated honey bee foraging behaviour, suggesting that both yeast-based attract-and-kill formulations pose a low non-target risk to honey bees.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Unknown 6 60%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 20%
Neuroscience 1 10%
Chemistry 1 10%
Unknown 6 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2025.
All research outputs
#31,409,028
of 34,593,328 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#202,723
of 225,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#310,326
of 358,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,568
of 1,787 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,593,328 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,172 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,787 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.