Interplay between sarcopenia, GDF-15, and the efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with mismatch repair deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: final survival analysis of the phase II GERCOR NIPICOL study
Sarcopenia and growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15) are linked to poor cancer survival. In this exploratory analysis, we evaluated their interaction with nivolumab-ipilimumab efficacy in chemoresistant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) harboring microsatellite instability and/or mismatch-repair deficiency (MSI/dMMR), based on the final survival analysis of the NIPICOL phase II trial.
57 patients with MSI/dMMR chemoresistant mCRC received nivolumab-ipilimumab for 3 months (3M), then, nivolumab alone for 9M. Skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) was evaluated by CT scan at baseline and 12M to assess sarcopenia. GDF-15 levels were assessed at baseline and 3M. Main endpoints were overall survival (OS) and immune Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors progression-free survival (iPFS).
After excluding three patients not confirmed as MSI/dMMR by central review, the overall median follow-up was 60.4 months. The 3-year and 5 year iPFS rates were 72.0% and 65.3%, with OS rates of 77.5% and 73.3%, respectively. Among 49 patients with evaluable GDF-15, high-baseline GDF-15 was associated with poorer survival: 3-year iPFS rate of 56.3% for GDF-15≥2500 versus 81.7% for GDF-15<2500 (PFS HR=2.45, 95% CI 0.91 to 6.55), 3-year OS rates of 61.4% versus 84.5% (OS HR=2.08, 95% CI 0.70 to 6.22). Of the 48 evaluable patients for SMI, 31 (65.0%) displayed sarcopenia at baseline. 11 out of 20 (55%) patients with baseline sarcopenia and assessed for SMI at 12M, reversed sarcopenia by 12M. They had higher baseline GDF-15 levels and greater GDF-15 decrease by 3M (delta mean change: -69.8% vs -40.3%) compared with patients who remained sarcopenic.
1-year nivolumab-ipilimumab demonstrates consistent efficacy after 5-year follow-up in an MSI/dMMR chemoresistant mCRC population. GDF-15 confirms to be a promising biomarker for sarcopenia and survival.
NCT03350126.
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
1
5%
Nursing and Health Professions
1
5%
Unknown
16
76%
Attention Score in Context
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2025.
All research outputs
#22,983,033
of 34,413,214 outputs
Outputs from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#3,614
of 4,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,976
of 357,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#55
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,413,214 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,731 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
