↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Algorithm-based management of patients with gastrointestinal symptoms in patients after pelvic radiation treatment (ORBIT): a randomised controlled trial
Published in
The Lancet, September 2013
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61648-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Belgium 2 1%
Japan 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 164 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 14%
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 34 20%
Unknown 34 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 14%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Psychology 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 47 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2025.
All research outputs
#1,378,194
of 32,862,835 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#9,743
of 50,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,374
of 239,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#90
of 487 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,862,835 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 50,683 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 487 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.