↓ Skip to main content

Outcomes With Femoral IABP in Heart Failure and Acute Myocardial Infarction-Related Cardiogenic Shock

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiac Failure, May 2025
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Outcomes With Femoral IABP in Heart Failure and Acute Myocardial Infarction-Related Cardiogenic Shock
Published in
Journal of Cardiac Failure, May 2025
DOI 10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.04.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

ARTHUR RESHAD GARAN, ARVIND BHIMARAJ, RACHNA KATARIA, ANIKET RALI, E. WILSON GRANDIN, ALVARO A. DELGADO, AJAR KOCHAR, BORUI LI, MANREET K. KANWAR, SHASHANK S. SINHA, JAIME HERNANDEZ-MONTFORT, JACOB ABRAHAM, SONG LI, ALEXANDRA ARIAS-MENDOZA, HIRAM BEZERRA, VANESSA BLUMER, I-HUI CHIANG, MARY JANE FARR, JUSTIN FRIED, ANN GAGE, SHELLEY HALL, GAVIN W. HICKEY, ONYEDIKA ILONZE, MAYA GUGLIN, WISSAM KHALIFE, JU KIM, SCOTT LUNDGREN, JEFFREY MARBACH, JOSEPH MISHKIN, SANDEEP NATHAN, MOHIT PAHUJA, ANDREW SCHWARTZMAN, VAN-KHUE TON, OLEG ALEC VISHNEVSKY, ESTHER VOROVICH, JOYCE WALD, ELRIC ZWECK, QIUYUE KONG, PAAVNI SANGAL, KAROL D. WALEC, PETER ZAZZALI, NEIL M. HARWANI, KEVIN JOHN, CLAUDIUS MAHR, DANIEL BURKHOFF, NAVIN K. KAPUR

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Lecturer 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 56%
Unspecified 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2026.
All research outputs
#3,831,862
of 33,053,952 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiac Failure
#610
of 2,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,024
of 348,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiac Failure
#7
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,053,952 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.