Overview of attention for article published in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions (Formerly Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis), June 2025
Altmetric Badge
About this Attention Score
Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source
Percutaneous Transcatheter Edge‐to‐Edge Repair for Functional Mitral Regurgitation in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials With Reconstructed Time‐to‐Event Data
Published in
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions (Formerly Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis), June 2025
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2025.
All research outputs
#22,335,124
of 34,391,611 outputs
Outputs from Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions (Formerly Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis)
#3,382
of 4,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,403
of 357,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions (Formerly Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis)
#30
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,391,611 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,705 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
