↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Application of ConvNeXt with transfer learning and data augmentation for malaria parasite detection in resource-limited settings using microscopic images
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2025
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0313734
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Malaria continues to be a severe health problem across the globe, especially within resource-limited areas which lack both skilled diagnostic personnel and diagnostic equipment. This study investigates the use of deep learning diagnosis for malaria through ConvNeXt models that incorporate transfer learning techniques with data augmentation methods for better model performance and transferability. A total number of 606276 thin blood smear images served as the final augmented dataset after the initial 27558 images underwent augmentation. The ConvNeXt Tiny model, version V1 Tiny, achieved an accuracy of 95.9%.; however, the upgraded V2 Tiny Remod version exceeded this benchmark, reaching 98.1% accuracy. The accuracy rate measured 61.4% for Swin Tiny, ResNet18 reached 62.6%, and ResNet50 obtained 81.4%. The combination of label smoothing with the AdamW optimiser produced a model which exhibited strong robustness as well as generalisability. The enhanced ConvNeXt V2 Tiny model combined with data augmentation, transfer learning techniques and explainability frameworks demonstrate a practical solution for malaria diagnosis that achieves high accuracy despite limitations of access to large datasets and microscopy expertise, often observed in resource-limited regions. The findings highlight the potential for real-time diagnostic applications in remote healthcare facilities and the viability of ConvNeXt models in enhancing malaria diagnosis globally.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 7 9%
Lecturer 4 5%
Student > Master 3 4%
Other 2 3%
Student > Bachelor 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 54 72%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 7 9%
Computer Science 6 8%
Engineering 4 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 53 71%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2025.
All research outputs
#31,244,521
of 34,427,821 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#202,210
of 224,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#310,752
of 359,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,565
of 1,794 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,427,821 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,794 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.