You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
Activity
X Demographics
Mendeley demographics
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Infection after CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for large B-cell lymphoma: real-world analysis from CIBMTR
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Blood Advances, October 2025
|
| DOI | 10.1182/bloodadvances.2025016141 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kitsada Wudhikarn, Megan M. Herr, Min Chen, Michael J. Martens, John H. Baird, Lohith Gowda, Hemalatha G. Rangarajan, Muhammad Bilal Abid, Mohamed A. Kharfan-Dabaja, Kirsten M. Williams, Siddhartha Ganguly, Jo-Anne H. Young, Akshay Sharma, Giancarlo Fatobene, Tania Jain, Christopher G. Kanakry, Dipenkumar Modi, Natalie S. Grover, Baheyeldin Salem, Marjorie Vieira Batista, Paschalis Vergidis, Dwight E. Yin, Amer M. Beitinjaneh, Amar H. Kelkar, Taiga Nishihori, Jennifer Holter Chakrabarty, Usama Gergis, Melody Smith, Zeinab El Boghdadly, Christopher E. Dandoy, Hemant S. Murthy, Anna R. Huppler, Miguel-Angel Perales, Roy F. Chemaly, Joshua A. Hill, Marcie Riches, Jeffery J. Auletta |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 44% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| Thailand | 2 | 6% |
| Czechia | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Greece | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Russia | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 25% |
| Scientists | 4 | 13% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 13% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 13 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2025.
All research outputs
#2,614,490
of 32,671,970 outputs
Outputs from Blood Advances
#662
of 4,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,926
of 356,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood Advances
#15
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,671,970 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.