↓ Skip to main content

Modelling the risk of food-borne transmission of Toxocara spp. to humans

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiology & Infection, June 2025
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Modelling the risk of food-borne transmission of Toxocara spp. to humans
Published in
Epidemiology & Infection, June 2025
DOI 10.1017/s0950268825000330
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 4 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2025.
All research outputs
#28,397,105
of 34,146,727 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiology & Infection
#4,079
of 4,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,530
of 357,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiology & Infection
#10
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,146,727 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.