↓ Skip to main content

Improving conservation outcomes for seadragons: data, knowledge gaps, and future directions

Overview of attention for article published in Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, May 2025
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
bluesky
2 Bluesky users

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Improving conservation outcomes for seadragons: data, knowledge gaps, and future directions
Published in
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, May 2025
DOI 10.1007/s11160-025-09950-x
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Unknown 8 62%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 15%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 8 62%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2025.
All research outputs
#2,696,449
of 34,332,182 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#140
of 892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,448
of 356,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,332,182 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.