↓ Skip to main content

New Method for Developing Pictograms to Improve User Understanding of Instructions for Over-the-Counter Medicine Package Inserts

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Drug Informatics, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
New Method for Developing Pictograms to Improve User Understanding of Instructions for Over-the-Counter Medicine Package Inserts
Published in
Japanese Journal of Drug Informatics, March 2017
DOI 10.11256/jjdi.18.223
Authors

Kana Kurata, Yuka Takahashi, Miho Iwasaki, Kyoko Paku, Shinichi Koyama, Haruo Hibino, Jun Yamashita

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2017.
All research outputs
#16,375,964
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Drug Informatics
#52
of 123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,466
of 338,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Drug Informatics
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.