↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Identification of core outcomes for quality in routine care provided to people living with dementia in Australia: a multilevel modified Delphi consensus study
Published in
BMJ Open, June 2025
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096059
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danelle Kenny, Alyssa Welch, Tiet-Hanh Dao-Tran, Karyn Lendich, Debbie Brittain, Jane Thompson, Bronte Parkin, Jack Nunn, Fleur O’Keefe, Ruth Semler, Benedict Davies, Tracy Comans, Alyssa Welch, Anna Kearney, Carly Meyer, Colm Cunningham, Danelle Kenny, Dominic Trepel, Glenys Petrie, Jack Nunn, John Quinn, Judy Lowthian, Kim-Huong Nguyen, Len Gray, Leon Flicker, Osvaldo Almeida, Sue Kurrle, Susanna Dodd, Safa Alrababah, Sanjib Hasa, Tiet-Hanh Dao-Tran, Tom Morris, Tracy Comans, Paula Williamson, Zoe Selby, Benedict Davies, Bronte Parkin, Debbie Brittain, Fleur O’Keefe, Jane Thompson, Karyn Lendich, Ruth Semler, Sonia Markoff, Subin Acharaya, Anthony Arrigo, Deborah Remfry, Joy & Bruce How, Julie Smith, Karen Gainey, Margaret & Myles Hampton-Chubb, Michelle Finnegan, Mithrani Mahadeva, Sandra Lewis, Virginia Aquilizan, Wernher Dela Cruz

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 8 24%
Unspecified 7 21%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 8 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 13 39%
Unspecified 7 21%
Psychology 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2025.
All research outputs
#16,808,506
of 28,524,028 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#16,134
of 27,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,992
of 161,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#47
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,524,028 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.