↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mutant Analysis in Arabidopsis Provides Insight into the Molecular Mode of Action of the Auxinic Herbicide Dicamba
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0017245
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 122 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 22%
Researcher 18 14%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 28 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 9%
Chemical Engineering 3 2%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 31 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,654,130
of 34,622,316 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#72,575
of 225,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,451
of 162,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#706
of 1,789 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,622,316 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,789 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.