↓ Skip to main content

Risk factors for perioperative mortality and transfusion in sacrococcygeal teratoma resections

Overview of attention for article published in Paediatric Anaesthesia, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Risk factors for perioperative mortality and transfusion in sacrococcygeal teratoma resections
Published in
Paediatric Anaesthesia, March 2017
DOI 10.1111/pan.13143
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Sacrococcygeal teratomas are a common congenital tumor. Surgical resection can occur in utero, in the neonatal period, or in the postneonatal period. We describe patient and tumor factors associated with mortality and transfusion in this population. We did a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent sacrococcygeal teratoma resection between January 1998 and March 2016. Demographic data, transfusion data, and tumor characteristics were collected. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and univariate comparisons were performed with chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. Variables significant at univariate level were used in multivariate logistic regression and negative binomial regression. Of the 112 cases, 6 were in utero repairs, 73 were neonatal repairs, and 33 were repairs at >30 days of life. There was 17%, 1%, and 0% intraoperative mortality and 33%, 5%, and 0% 30-day mortality in the in utero, neonatal, and >30 days of life repairs, respectively. All six patients who died within the first 30 days of life had a postmenstrual age of <32 weeks at time of surgery. All six patients who died had noncystic tumors. Patients with noncystic tumors were more likely to be born prior to 30-week gestation (23/65 vs 6/47; χ(2) = 7.3; P = 0.007). Gestational age >30 weeks was associated with decreased intraoperative death (0% vs 10%; modified maximum likelihood estimate of OR 0.05; 95% CI 0.002-0.96; P = 0.02). Gestational age >30 weeks (2.4% vs 13.8%; OR 0.15; 95% CI 0.03-0.89; P = 0.04) and cystic morphology (0% vs 9.2%; modified maximum likelihood estimate of OR 0.1; CI 0.01-1.75; P = 0.04) were associated with decreased 30-day mortality and emergent surgery (17.9% vs 1.2%; OR 18; 95% CI 2-162.2; P = 0.004) was associated with increased 30-day mortality. Gestational age >30 weeks (33.7% vs 62.1%; OR 0.27; 95% CI 0.09-0.79; P = 0.02) and Altman class 3-4 (12.1% vs 52.7%; OR 0.1; 95% CI 0.03-0.34; P = 0.0002) were associated with decreased need for transfusion and noncystic tumor was associated with increased transfusion volume (131.6 ml·kg(-1) [95% CI 94-184] vs 63 ml·kg(-1) [95% CI 40-100.1]; P = 0.01). Prematurity is associated with increased intraoperative and 30-day mortality. Noncystic tumor morphology was the only significant factor associated with transfusion volume and all six patients who died had transfusion volumes of 240 ml·kg(-1) or greater. In these patients at high risk of mortality due to blood loss, the anesthesia team should be prepared to manage massive transfusion and coagulopathy with blood components and pharmacologic measures.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 18%
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Postgraduate 4 12%
Other 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 9 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 53%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Mathematics 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 8 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2021.
All research outputs
#10,701,927
of 34,546,575 outputs
Outputs from Paediatric Anaesthesia
#777
of 2,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,926
of 353,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Paediatric Anaesthesia
#16
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,546,575 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,913 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.