Do Recent DNA Studies Refute a 65 kya Arrival of Humans in Sahul?

Overview of attention for article published in Archaeology in Oceania, June 2025

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 289)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news: 1 news outlet
twitter: 3 X users

reddit: 1 Redditor
bluesky: 7 Bluesky users

Readers on

mendeley: 3 Mendeley

So far, Altmetric has seen 7 Bluesky posts from 7 Bluesky users, with an upper bound of 22,847 followers.

Commentary: Do Recent DNA Studies Refute a 65 kya Arrival of Humans in Sahul?🏺🧪 Peter Veth, @huwgroucutt.bsky.social, @elliescerri.bsky.social, et al onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1... Recent DNA Studies Question a 65 kya Arrival of Humans in Sah…

RP @huwgroucutt.bsky.social: "Do Recent DNA Studies Refute a 65 kya Arrival of Humans in Sahul?" See comment by @elliescerri.bsky.social and myself here: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/...

This page shows the most recent Bluesky posts that mention this research output. Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 3 additional Bluesky posts.