↓ Skip to main content

Massive Bleeding in Children With Cancer or Hematopoietic Cell Transplant: International, Multicenter Retrospective Study, 2017–2021

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, April 2025
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
video
1 YouTube creator
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Massive Bleeding in Children With Cancer or Hematopoietic Cell Transplant: International, Multicenter Retrospective Study, 2017–2021
Published in
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, April 2025
DOI 10.1097/pcc.0000000000003751
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marianne E. Nellis, Marie E. Steiner, Saleh Bhar, Jennifer McArthur, Ali McMichael, April L. Rahrig, Christine Leeper, Salvatore Perdichizzi, Fabrizio Chiusolo, Jacob Shamash, Nora Bruns, Hilary Schreiber, Matthew P. Sharron, Laura Butragueño-Laiseca, James S. Killinger, Charlene P. Pringle, Samantha M. Koenig, Cassandra Josephson, David Crawford, Briana L. Scott, Kenneth E. Remy, Christine Puthawala, Philip C. Spinella, and in collaboration with the Pediatric Critical Care Blood Research Network subgroup and the Hematopoietic Cell Transplant subgroup of the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators Network on behalf of the Massive Transfusion In Children -Cancer Investigators

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 40%
Unknown 3 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2025.
All research outputs
#17,056,795
of 28,836,933 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
#2,626
of 4,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,584
of 323,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
#6
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,836,933 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.