↓ Skip to main content

Motor-iconicity of sign language does not alter the neural systems underlying tool and action naming

Overview of attention for article published in Brain & Language, April 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Motor-iconicity of sign language does not alter the neural systems underlying tool and action naming
Published in
Brain & Language, April 2004
DOI 10.1016/s0093-934x(03)00309-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Netherlands 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Spain 2 2%
Germany 2 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 110 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 23%
Professor 13 10%
Student > Master 10 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 13 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 40 32%
Linguistics 32 26%
Neuroscience 11 9%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 19 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2015.
All research outputs
#12,436,002
of 34,545,128 outputs
Outputs from Brain & Language
#487
of 1,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,441
of 90,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain & Language
#7
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,545,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,302 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.