↓ Skip to main content

Progressive Resistance Training Without Volume Increases Does Not Alter Arterial Stiffness and Aortic Wave Reflection

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Biology and Medicine, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Progressive Resistance Training Without Volume Increases Does Not Alter Arterial Stiffness and Aortic Wave Reflection
Published in
Experimental Biology and Medicine, November 2016
DOI 10.3181/0703-rm-65
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
China 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 105 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 18%
Student > Master 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Researcher 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 26 24%
Unknown 17 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 42 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 20 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2015.
All research outputs
#9,840,351
of 28,775,965 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Biology and Medicine
#659
of 1,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,618
of 418,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Biology and Medicine
#141
of 328 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,775,965 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,788 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 328 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.