↓ Skip to main content

Revisiting Ethical Guidelines for Research with Terminal Wean and Brain‐Dead Participants

Overview of attention for article published in Hastings Center Report, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Revisiting Ethical Guidelines for Research with Terminal Wean and Brain‐Dead Participants
Published in
Hastings Center Report, March 2012
DOI 10.2307/3527910
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Germany 2 8%
South Africa 1 4%
Unknown 23 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 15%
Researcher 4 15%
Professor 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Lecturer 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 6 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 23%
Philosophy 5 19%
Arts and Humanities 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 6 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,785,625
of 28,667,723 outputs
Outputs from Hastings Center Report
#650
of 1,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,904
of 176,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hastings Center Report
#113
of 427 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,667,723 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 427 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.