↓ Skip to main content

Artificial ponds do not support the natural functional and taxonomic composition of alpine dragon- and damselfly communities

Overview of attention for article published in Global Ecology and Conservation, October 2025
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
bluesky
3 Bluesky users

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Artificial ponds do not support the natural functional and taxonomic composition of alpine dragon- and damselfly communities
Published in
Global Ecology and Conservation, October 2025
DOI 10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03708
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 50%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 2 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 33%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2025.
All research outputs
#4,729,089
of 29,054,097 outputs
Outputs from Global Ecology and Conservation
#663
of 1,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,303
of 12,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Ecology and Conservation
#8
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,054,097 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,990 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.