↓ Skip to main content

Dendroscope 3: An Interactive Tool for Rooted Phylogenetic Trees and Networks

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Biology, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
patent
12 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
830 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Dendroscope 3: An Interactive Tool for Rooted Phylogenetic Trees and Networks
Published in
Systematic Biology, September 2012
DOI 10.1093/sysbio/sys062
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 830 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 8 <1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
Russia 2 <1%
Other 11 1%
Unknown 790 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 181 22%
Researcher 164 20%
Student > Master 104 13%
Student > Bachelor 60 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 43 5%
Other 101 12%
Unknown 177 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 345 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 154 19%
Computer Science 28 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 25 3%
Environmental Science 20 2%
Other 64 8%
Unknown 194 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2024.
All research outputs
#2,728,186
of 33,738,238 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Biology
#307
of 2,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,451
of 224,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Biology
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,738,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,097 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.