↓ Skip to main content

Critical research gaps and translational priorities for the successful prevention and treatment of breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
981 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Critical research gaps and translational priorities for the successful prevention and treatment of breast cancer
Published in
Breast Cancer Research, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/bcr3493
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Breast cancer remains a significant scientific, clinical and societal challenge. This gap analysis has reviewed and critically assessed enduring issues and new challenges emerging from recent research, and proposes strategies for translating solutions into practice.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 981 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 <1%
Denmark 4 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 956 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 164 17%
Researcher 140 14%
Student > Master 126 13%
Student > Bachelor 94 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 47 5%
Other 161 16%
Unknown 249 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 172 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 165 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 117 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 51 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 25 3%
Other 161 16%
Unknown 290 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2021.
All research outputs
#834,766
of 32,463,143 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research
#70
of 2,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,124
of 244,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research
#6
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,463,143 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,549 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.