↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Adverse Events Associated With Mohs Micrographic Surgery: Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study of 20 821 Cases at 23 Centers
Published in
JAMA Dermatology, December 2013
DOI 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.6255
Pubmed ID
Authors

Murad Alam, Omer Ibrahim, Michael Nodzenski, John M. Strasswimmer, Shang I. Brian Jiang, Joel L. Cohen, Brian J. Albano, Priya Batra, Ramona Behshad, Anthony V. Benedetto, C. Stanley Chan, Suneel Chilukuri, Courtney Crocker, Hillary W. Crystal, Anir Dhir, Victoria A. Faulconer, Leonard H. Goldberg, Chandra Goodman, Steven S. Greenbaum, Elizabeth K. Hale, C. William Hanke, George J. Hruza, Laurie Jacobson, Jason Jones, Arash Kimyai-Asadi, David Kouba, James Lahti, Kristi Macias, Stanley J. Miller, Edward Monk, Tri H. Nguyen, Gagik Oganesyan, Michelle Pennie, Katherine Pontius, William Posten, Jennifer L. Reichel, Thomas E. Rohrer, James A. Rooney, Hien T. Tran, Emily Poon, Diana Bolotin, Meghan Dubina, Natalie Pace, Natalie Kim, Wareeporn Disphanurat, Ummul Kathawalla, Rohit Kakar, Dennis P. West, Emir Veledar, Simon Yoo

Abstract

Detailed information regarding perioperative risk and adverse events associated with Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) can guide clinical management. Much of the data regarding complications of MMS are anecdotal or report findings from single centers or single events.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 108 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 15 14%
Other 8 7%
Professor 8 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Other 22 20%
Unknown 43 40%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Decision Sciences 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 47 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2025.
All research outputs
#6,453,006
of 29,583,705 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Dermatology
#2,434
of 4,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,917
of 338,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Dermatology
#25
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,583,705 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.