↓ Skip to main content

Terrestrial carbon is a resource, but not a subsidy, for lake zooplankton

Overview of attention for article published in Ecology, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Terrestrial carbon is a resource, but not a subsidy, for lake zooplankton
Published in
Ecology, May 2014
DOI 10.1890/13-1586.1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick T. Kelly, Christopher T. Solomon, Brian C. Weidel, Stuart E. Jones

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Canada 3 2%
Brazil 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 152 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 25%
Researcher 32 20%
Student > Master 25 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 5%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 21 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 37%
Environmental Science 51 31%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 31 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2014.
All research outputs
#4,792,785
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ecology
#2,203
of 7,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,325
of 245,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology
#17
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,181 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.