↓ Skip to main content

Hexadecane decay by methanogenesis

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, April 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
147 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hexadecane decay by methanogenesis
Published in
Nature, April 2000
DOI 10.1038/35008145
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert T. Anderson, Derek R. Lovley

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Brazil 2 3%
Canada 2 3%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 64 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Professor 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 17 24%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 17 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 21%
Engineering 3 4%
Energy 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 14 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2015.
All research outputs
#7,523,962
of 22,961,203 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#65,584
of 91,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,979
of 39,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#192
of 324 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,961,203 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,207 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.5. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 324 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.