↓ Skip to main content

Emotional distress in mothers of preterm hospitalized infants: a feasibility trial of nurse-delivered treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Perinatology, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Emotional distress in mothers of preterm hospitalized infants: a feasibility trial of nurse-delivered treatment
Published in
Journal of Perinatology, August 2013
DOI 10.1038/jp.2013.93
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Mothers of preterm infants in a hospital neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) are at risk for clinically significant depression and anxiety, but for these women their own treatment is likely a secondary priority. This study evaluated the feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of an evidence-based, nurse-delivered, on-site depression treatment: listening visits (LVs).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 169 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 16%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Other 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 32 19%
Unknown 54 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 33 19%
Psychology 32 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 16%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 57 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2019.
All research outputs
#833,438
of 28,833,811 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Perinatology
#59
of 3,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,004
of 214,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Perinatology
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,833,811 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,398 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.