↓ Skip to main content

Quantification of Excision Repair Cross-Complementing Group 1 and Survival in p16-Negative Squamous Cell Head and Neck Cancers

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Quantification of Excision Repair Cross-Complementing Group 1 and Survival in p16-Negative Squamous Cell Head and Neck Cancers
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, December 2013
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-13-0152
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Multimodality treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) often involves radiotherapy and cisplatin-based therapy. Elevated activity of DNA repair mechanisms, such as the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway, of which ERCC1 is a rate-limiting element, are associated with cisplatin and possibly RT resistance. We have determined excision repair cross-complementing group 1 (ERCC1) expression in human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative SCCHN treated with surgery [± adjuvant radiotherapy/chemoradiation (CRT)].

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Postgraduate 5 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 12%
Other 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 8 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2014.
All research outputs
#3,345,736
of 27,460,276 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#2,989
of 13,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,122
of 330,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#28
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,460,276 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.