↓ Skip to main content

The Health and Economic Well‐Being of US Mothers with Intellectual Impairments

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Health and Economic Well‐Being of US Mothers with Intellectual Impairments
Published in
Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, March 2017
DOI 10.1111/jar.12308
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

While the United States has seen increased attention by policymakers on the rights of parents with disabilities, there is limited understanding of the health and economic well-being of parents with intellectual impairments. This study compares the health and economic well-being of mothers with and without intellectual impairments. This descriptive, exploratory study is a secondary analysis of the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study. This study includes a subsample of mothers of three-year-old children (n = 1561), including mothers with intellectual impairments (n = 263) and without intellectual impairments (n = 1298). US Mothers with intellectual impairments are more likely to report serious health conditions, have less instrumental support, live in poverty, receive public benefits and experience certain material hardships. Findings from this study indicate the need for policies and programmes to support parents with intellectual impairments by addressing their health and economic needs.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Researcher 4 6%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 33 46%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 12 17%
Social Sciences 9 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 36 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2017.
All research outputs
#21,643,741
of 32,460,822 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
#1,035
of 1,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,794
of 342,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
#15
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,460,822 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,456 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.