↓ Skip to main content

Household social capital and socioeconomic inequalities in child undernutrition in rural India

Overview of attention for article published in Social Science & Medicine, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
22 news outlets
twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Household social capital and socioeconomic inequalities in child undernutrition in rural India
Published in
Social Science & Medicine, March 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.043
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Social capital has gained attention for poverty reduction efforts in low- and middle-income countries, but questions remain about people's unequal access to and benefits from social capital-especially for addressing child health inequalities. Analyzing 2005 India Human Development Survey data on 9008 rural-dwelling children and their families, we test hypotheses regarding how SES shapes household access to and child health benefits from three different forms of social capital located inside and outside the community. Specifically, we examine households' memberships in bonding and bridging organizations, which respectively connect people who are socio-demographically similar and dissimilar, and linking ties to representatives of formal institutions (health care, education, and government) who have power and privilege in society. Results indicate that greater household wealth is associated with each social capital form and amplifies the extent that linking ties to medical and educational institutions, and within-village bridging organizations are associated with lower odds of child underweight. Our findings warrant considering the unequal distribution, differential utility, and geographic location of social capital in designing efforts to address health inequalities.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 187 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 14%
Researcher 24 13%
Student > Master 22 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 4%
Other 35 19%
Unknown 59 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 43 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 3%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 72 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 173. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2018.
All research outputs
#291,722
of 34,242,763 outputs
Outputs from Social Science & Medicine
#259
of 13,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,896
of 352,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Science & Medicine
#13
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,242,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,980 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.