↓ Skip to main content

Reconsidering Access: Park Facilities and Neighborhood Disamenities in New York City

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Urban Health, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Reconsidering Access: Park Facilities and Neighborhood Disamenities in New York City
Published in
Journal of Urban Health, March 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11524-011-9551-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 200 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 23%
Student > Master 38 18%
Researcher 24 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 43 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 53 26%
Environmental Science 24 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 6%
Design 12 6%
Engineering 10 5%
Other 34 16%
Unknown 61 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,968,051
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Urban Health
#374
of 1,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,263
of 158,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Urban Health
#4
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,641 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.