↓ Skip to main content

Institutional Corruption of Pharmaceuticals and the Myth of Safe and Effective Drugs

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
421 X users
facebook
10 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
136 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Institutional Corruption of Pharmaceuticals and the Myth of Safe and Effective Drugs
Published in
The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, January 2021
DOI 10.1111/jlme.12068
Pubmed ID
Authors

Donald W. Light, Joel Lexchin, Jonathan J. Darrow

Abstract

Over the past 35 years, patients have suffered from a largely hidden epidemic of side effects from drugs that usually have few offsetting benefits. The pharmaceutical industry has corrupted the practice of medicine through its influence over what drugs are developed, how they are tested, and how medical knowledge is created. Since 1906, heavy commercial influence has compromised congressional legislation to protect the public from unsafe drugs. The authorization of user fees in 1992 has turned drug companies into the FDA's prime clients, deepening the regulatory and cultural capture of the agency. Industry has demanded shorter average review times and, with less time to thoroughly review evidence, increased hospitalizations and deaths have resulted. Meeting the needs of the drug companies has taken priority over meeting the needs of patients. Unless this corruption of regulatory intent is reversed, the situation will continue to deteriorate. We offer practical suggestions including: separating the funding of clinical trials from their conduct, analysis, and publication; independent FDA leadership; full public funding for all FDA activities; measures to discourage R&D on drugs with few, if any, new clinical benefits; and the creation of a National Drug Safety Board.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 421 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 160 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 19%
Researcher 25 15%
Student > Bachelor 24 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 11%
Other 14 8%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 27 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 22%
Social Sciences 21 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 5%
Psychology 8 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Other 49 30%
Unknown 35 21%