↓ Skip to main content

A Protocol for Evaluating Learning Outcomes Using Reverse Jigsaw and Edpuzzle in Doctoral Business Education: A Q-Methodology Study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Qualitative Methods, April 2025
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Protocol for Evaluating Learning Outcomes Using Reverse Jigsaw and Edpuzzle in Doctoral Business Education: A Q-Methodology Study
Published in
International Journal of Qualitative Methods, April 2025
DOI 10.1177/16094069251326412
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 13%
Unknown 14 88%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Unknown 14 88%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2025.
All research outputs
#18,766,145
of 29,678,589 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Qualitative Methods
#821
of 1,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,408
of 330,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Qualitative Methods
#17
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,678,589 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,374 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.