↓ Skip to main content

Complex relationships between structural and functional brain connectivity

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Cognitive Sciences, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
399 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Complex relationships between structural and functional brain connectivity
Published in
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, October 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.011
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In recent work, O'Reilly and colleagues demonstrate relatively intact interhemispheric functional connectivity in a macaque brain in the absence of major commissural fibers. This work adds to a growing body of literature challenging the notion that structural and functional brain connectivity metrics are related in a straightforward manner.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 399 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
Germany 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 373 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 90 23%
Researcher 74 19%
Student > Master 38 10%
Student > Bachelor 27 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 6%
Other 85 21%
Unknown 61 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 103 26%
Neuroscience 76 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 8%
Engineering 23 6%
Other 43 11%
Unknown 92 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2013.
All research outputs
#6,954,933
of 32,947,764 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Cognitive Sciences
#1,806
of 2,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,493
of 245,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Cognitive Sciences
#24
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,947,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.