↓ Skip to main content

Priming Patient Safety Through Nursing Handoff Communication: A Simulation Pilot Study

Overview of attention for article published in Western Journal of Nursing Research, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Priming Patient Safety Through Nursing Handoff Communication: A Simulation Pilot Study
Published in
Western Journal of Nursing Research, October 2016
DOI 10.1177/0193945916673358
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Understanding how safety culture mechanisms affect nursing safety-oriented behavior and thus patient outcomes is critical to developing hospital safety programs. Safety priming refers to communicating safety values intended to activate patient safety goals. Safety priming through nursing handoff communication was tested as a means by which cultural safety values may affect nursing practice. The mixed-methods pilot study setting was an academic medical center's high-fidelity simulation lab. Twenty nurses were randomized into intervention and control groups. The intervention group received a safety priming intervention; all participants were observed for completing appropriate actions in response to patient safety risks embedded in a scenario. Stimulated recall interviews were conducted following simulation completion. Nurses receiving the safety priming intervention performed slightly but non-significantly more safety actions than nurses who did not (60.5% vs. 57.9% of 43 actions). Implications for both research and practice are discussed for interventions targeting routine versus safety goal-directed nursing actions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 105 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Lecturer 5 5%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 41 39%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 37 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 10%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Engineering 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 39 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2026.
All research outputs
#7,318,520
of 27,839,537 outputs
Outputs from Western Journal of Nursing Research
#166
of 993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,897
of 314,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Western Journal of Nursing Research
#8
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,839,537 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.