↓ Skip to main content

Diabetes Risk Factors, Diabetes Risk Algorithms, and the Prediction of Future Frailty: The Whitehall II Prospective Cohort Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Diabetes Risk Factors, Diabetes Risk Algorithms, and the Prediction of Future Frailty: The Whitehall II Prospective Cohort Study
Published in
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, October 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.08.016
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To examine whether established diabetes risk factors and diabetes risk algorithms are associated with future frailty.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 148 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Student > Master 15 10%
Other 9 6%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 56 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Computer Science 5 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 66 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,250,003
of 33,087,078 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
#240
of 3,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,561
of 247,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
#2
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,087,078 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,679 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.