↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Corrigendum to Evidence and Consensus-Based Imaging Guidelines in Multifocal Choroiditis With Panuveitis and Punctate Inner Choroiditis-Multimodal Imaging in Uveitis (MUV) Taskforce Report 5. Am J Ophthalmol. 2025;276:272-285
Published in
American Journal of Ophthalmology, August 2025
DOI 10.1016/j.ajo.2025.08.027
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sapna Gangaputra, Aniruddha Agarwal, Jeannette Ossewaarde-Van Norel, Edmund Tsui, Jennifer E. Thorne, Alejandra de-la-Torre, Michael Altaweel, Jyotirmay Biswas, Srinivas Sadda, Alessandro Invernizzi, Rupesh Agrawal, Jessica G. Shantha, Massimo Accorinti, Amani Fawzi, Douglas A. Jabs, David Sarraf, Vishali Gupta, Collaborators: Multimodal Imaging in Uveitis Task force, Alejandra de-la-Torre, Alejandro Fonollosa, Alessandro Invernizzi, Amani Fawzi, Andrew Dick, Aniruddha Agarwal, Anita Agarwal, Antoine Brezin, Ariel Schlaen, Bahram Bodaghi, Claudia Fabiani, David Sarraf, Debra A Goldstein, Dilraj Grewal, Douglas A Jabs, Edmund Tsui, Elisabetta Miserocchi, Ester Carreño, Francesco Pichi, Ilknur Tugal-Tutkun, Inês Leal, Janet L Davis, Jeanette Ossewaarde-van Norel, Jennifer E Thorne, Jessica G Shantha, Jose S Pulido, Justine Smith, Jyotirmay Biswas, K Bailey Freund, Kathryn Pepple, Lee M Jampol, Luca Cimino, Marc De Smet, Maria Vittoria Cicinelli, Marion R Munk, Massimo Accorinti, Maura Di Nicola, Meghan Berkenstock, Michael Altaweel, Phoebe Lin, Quan Dong Nguyen, Richard Spaide, Rupesh Agrawal, Sapna S Gangaputra, Soon Phaik Chee, Srinivas Sadda, Sumit Sharma, Timothy M Janetos, Vishali Gupta, Zohar Habot-Wilner

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 20%
Computer Science 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2025.
All research outputs
#20,340,641
of 29,247,377 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Ophthalmology
#5,405
of 7,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,703
of 172,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Ophthalmology
#14
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,247,377 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,676 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.