Early mobilization of patients while in hospital has been demonstrated to provide better outcomes for patients, and use less resources. Physiotherapy-based rehabilitation is central to achieving those goals. Successful rehabilitation requires that patient and therapist goals align, and this is commonly the case. However, occasionally physical therapists will come across competent patients who are reluctant to mobilize. This leaves the physical therapist in an ethical quandary; either accept the patient's right to refuse proposed treatment, or, utilize other strategies to encourage the patient to comply. Practically, physical therapists will employ a range of treatment pressures, including persuasion, offering incentives, inducements, and possibly threatening or coercing, and even explicitly overriding the patient's wishes (compulsion). Deciding which treatment pressure is ethically acceptable involves the physical therapist balancing their therapeutic view of what is in a patient's best interests against their ethical responsibility to respect patient autonomy. This paper evaluates some common strategies used by physical therapists to influence, persuade or perhaps pressure patients to adhere to rehabilitation. We utilize the work of Szmukler and Appelbaum in analyzing treatment pressures. We conclude that there is a spectrum of treatment pressures with some (persuasion and incentives) being more acceptable than others (threats and compulsion). As physical therapists balance health system pressures for rapid turnover of beds with obligations to benefit patients within limited reimbursement models, and respect their autonomy, they must be mindful of the effects of treatment pressure on patient care.