↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Frankenstein, thematic analysis and generative artificial intelligence: Quality appraisal methods and considerations for qualitative research
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2025
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0330217
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 3 16%
Unspecified 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 58%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Mathematics 1 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 11 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2025.
All research outputs
#23,123,286
of 34,147,617 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#142,818
of 223,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,401
of 349,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#636
of 1,397 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,147,617 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,918 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,397 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.