The 12-lead ECG is recommended in clinical guidelines for prehospital assessment of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) presenting to Emergency Medical Services (EMS).
To determine prehospital ECG (PHECG) utilisation since UK national rollout of primary percutaneous coronary intervention, and whether this is associated with clinical outcomes in patients with ACS.
Population-based, linked cohort study using Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project data from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2017, related to patients with ACS conveyed by the EMS to hospital in England and Wales.
PHECG administration.
Proportion of patients where PHECG was recorded, 30-day and 1 year all-cause mortality, use of reperfusion.
Of 330 713 eligible patients transferred by EMS, 263 420 patients (79.7%) had PHECG recorded, steadily increasing from 74.2% in 2010 to 85.0% in 2017. Patients who received PHECG were generally younger than those who did not (median age: 70 years vs 75 years), less likely to be female (32.8% vs 41.9%) or to have comorbidities such as diabetes (20.8% vs 24.7%) or peripheral vascular disease (4.1% vs 4.8%). Patients who received PHECG had lower mortality at 30 days (7.1% vs 10.9%), with adjusted OR 0.77 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.80), and at 1 year (14.2% vs 23.2%), with adjusted OR 0.69 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.71). Adjustment accommodated demographic characteristics, comorbidities and medical history. Reperfusion was more frequent in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) receiving PHECG (84.5% vs 54.7%) with adjusted OR 4.37 (95% CI 4.20 to 4.54), with similar adjustment.
Use of PHECG by EMS for patients with ACS is associated with lower short-term mortality and higher odds of receiving reperfusion for STEMI patients. Administration of PHECG increased steadily over time, but at the end of the study, still 15% of eligible patients did not receive a PHECG.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2025.
All research outputs
#18,089,640
of 29,324,569 outputs
Outputs from Heart
#5,205
of 6,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,122
of 184,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart
#12
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,324,569 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,857 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.4. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
