↓ Skip to main content

AAV: An Overview of Unanswered Questions

Overview of attention for article published in Human Gene Therapy, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
8 X users
patent
8 patents
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator
podcasts
2 podcasts

Readers on

mendeley
336 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
AAV: An Overview of Unanswered Questions
Published in
Human Gene Therapy, April 2017
DOI 10.1089/hum.2017.048
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Today AAV is one of the most promising and successful gene therapy vectors. AAV vectors have been successful in the treatment of several monogenic diseases in early clinical trials1. Although work in the past has focused primarily on gene replacement, many investigators are now adapting the vector system to new clinical modalities including RNAi and gene modifying strategies such as Crisper/cas91. Moreover, Glybera2 has been licensed for clinical use in the European Union for treatment of a lysosomal storage disease. To reach this level of success has taken more than thirty years from the initial isolation of an infectious AAV clone and the development of AAV vectors for long term expression3-5. This has included the development of so-called scalable production systems that promise to deliver large quantities of vector for both clinical trials and eventually for patient therapies6. We have been studying AAV for 55 years and developing it as a vector for about 35 years. By now we have a fairly good idea of the dimensions of what would be useful to know to optimally employ AAV as a vector, but there are still many unanswered questions within the system. Like all biological systems, each good experiment raises further questions to answer. We will devote this paper to an overview of those areas in which we can identify information we don't know, and those questions which we haven't yet recognized. Some of these are touched on in the six review articles in this issue of Human Gene Therapy.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 336 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 333 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 68 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 16%
Student > Bachelor 33 10%
Student > Master 30 9%
Other 16 5%
Other 33 10%
Unknown 103 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 95 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 6%
Neuroscience 21 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 3%
Other 34 10%
Unknown 110 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2026.
All research outputs
#1,171,573
of 33,732,945 outputs
Outputs from Human Gene Therapy
#104
of 3,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,990
of 351,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Gene Therapy
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,732,945 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,430 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.