↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
bluesky
2 Bluesky users

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Single-cell Genomic Copy Number Evolution Reveals Frequent Loss of the Y chromosome in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
Published in
bioRxiv, September 2025
DOI 10.1101/2025.09.14.676175
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), an aggressive cancer, is rising in Western countries, and incidence is higher in men. To better understand the roles of DNA copy number evolution, tumor heterogeneity, and tumor microenvironment in EAC and its origins, we evaluated EAC, Barrett's Esophagus (BE), and normal adjacent tissue using our previously developed ultra-sensitive, single-nucleus DNA copy number analysis (12,186 nuclei, 20 specimens) and single-nucleus RNA-sequencing (snRNA-seq; 87,027 nuclei, 32 specimens). Loss of Y (LOY) chromosome was rare in BE but markedly enriched in EAC. In genome unstable cells, complete LOY chromosome often coincided with X-chromosome duplication. We did not detect X-chromosome inactivation via XIST expression in cells with LOY, suggesting increased expression of X-chromosome genes and potential effects on tumor immune evasion. When considering patients' clinical features, we identified distinct differences in tumor microenvironment by sex, age, and obesity status, particularly massively reduced immune cell composition in obese patients. Finally, our cell line models recapitulate LOY, and we identify the first candidate anti-LOY agent. Our findings highlight how LOY affects tumor subpopulations and shapes the tumor microenvironment during EAC progression.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 50%
Professor 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 75%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2025.
All research outputs
#20,972,860
of 30,074,296 outputs
Outputs from bioRxiv
#6,546
of 12,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,595
of 341,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from bioRxiv
#2,233
of 4,633 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,074,296 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,512 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,633 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.