↓ Skip to main content

Sedation Practices during Continuous Neuromuscular Blockade for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, September 2025
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Sedation Practices during Continuous Neuromuscular Blockade for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Published in
Annals of the American Thoracic Society, September 2025
DOI 10.1513/annalsats.202411-1225oc
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2025.
All research outputs
#24,061,292
of 29,307,002 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the American Thoracic Society
#3,140
of 3,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,784
of 202,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the American Thoracic Society
#40
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,307,002 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.