You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Studies on the Cocoon of the Oriental Moth, Monema (Cnidocampa) flavescens, (Lepidoptera:Limacodidae)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology, January 1984
|
| DOI | 10.1303/jjaez.28.269 |
| Authors |
Shoziro ISHII, Tamio INOKUCHI, Jun KANAZAWA, Chojiro TOMIZAWA |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2019.
All research outputs
#6,396,173
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology
#17
of 156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,994
of 35,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 156 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them