↓ Skip to main content

Human Influences on Nitrogen Removal in Lakes

Overview of attention for article published in Science, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
19 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
332 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Human Influences on Nitrogen Removal in Lakes
Published in
Science, October 2013
DOI 10.1126/science.1242575
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Human activities have increased the availability of reactive nitrogen in many ecosystems, leading to negative impacts on human health, biodiversity, and water quality. Freshwater ecosystems, including lakes, streams, and wetlands, are a large global sink for reactive nitrogen, but factors that determine the efficacy of freshwater nitrogen removal rates are poorly known. Using a global lake data set, we show that the availability of phosphorus, a limiting nutrient, affects both annual nitrogen removal rate and efficiency. This result indicates that increased phosphorus inputs from human activities have stimulated nitrogen removal processes in many lakes. Recent management-driven reductions in phosphorus availability promote water column accumulation and export of nitrogen from large lakes, an unintended consequence of single-element management that argues for greater control of nitrogen as well as phosphorus sources.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 332 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Germany 4 1%
Switzerland 3 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 312 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 73 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 22%
Student > Master 39 12%
Student > Bachelor 20 6%
Other 18 5%
Other 63 19%
Unknown 47 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 128 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 73 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 30 9%
Engineering 13 4%
Chemistry 4 1%
Other 15 5%
Unknown 69 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2018.
All research outputs
#620,999
of 34,441,029 outputs
Outputs from Science
#13,531
of 94,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,300
of 259,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#148
of 853 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,441,029 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 94,082 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 853 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.