↓ Skip to main content

Could continuous subcutaneous glucose sensors (CGMS) be repurposed to diagnose diabetes in equivocal or challenging cases?

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism, July 2025
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Could continuous subcutaneous glucose sensors (CGMS) be repurposed to diagnose diabetes in equivocal or challenging cases?
Published in
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism, July 2025
DOI 10.1111/dom.16624
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2025.
All research outputs
#24,789,384
of 34,413,214 outputs
Outputs from Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
#4,097
of 6,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,925
of 351,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
#96
of 218 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,413,214 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,085 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 218 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.