The mechanism by which ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN) responds to topical interferon-alpha-2b (IFNα2b) is not known. We report the cases of 3 immunosuppressed patients whose tumors did not respond to topical IFNα2b therapy. The purpose of this series is to shed light on potential mechanisms of IFNα2b in OSSN.
Retrospective case series of 3 immunosuppressed patients whose biopsy-proven OSSN did not respond to topical IFNα2b treatment.
Three white, immunosuppressed males (mean age 70 years, range 66-76) were diagnosed with OSSN. Topical IFNα2b 1 million units/mL was administered 4 times a day and used for a mean of 5 months (range 2-7 mo) without an adequate response. All patients were then switched to 5-fluorouracil. Successful eradication of OSSN was achieved in 2 cases, and improvement of OSSN in another. The latter patient was switched to mitomycin-C with subsequent resolution of OSSN.
These cases suggest that an intact immune system may be an important link between IFNα2b therapy and tumor resolution. As such, topical IFNα2b may not be an optimal choice for patients with underlying immunosuppression. It may be more effective in this patient population to switch to a non-immune-modulating therapy such as 5-fluorouracil or mitomycin-C.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2017.
All research outputs
#24,787,356
of 34,411,289 outputs
Outputs from Cornea : The Journal of Cornea and External Disease
#2,115
of 4,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#324,574
of 468,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cornea : The Journal of Cornea and External Disease
#30
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,411,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,160 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 468,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
