↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

bluesky
3 Bluesky users

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A high-resolution crossover landscape in Drosophila santomea reveals rapid and concerted evolution of multiple properties of crossing over control
Published in
PLoS Genetics, October 2025
DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011885
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Crossing over is a fundamental process in sexually reproducing species, ensuring proper chromosome segregation during gamete formation and generating new allelic combinations that enhance adaptation. Despite its essential role, genes involved in crossing over evolve rapidly and there is extensive variation in the rate and genomic distribution of crossovers across species. Considering this rapid evolution, identifying differences between very closely related species is crucial for understanding the molecular basis of natural variation in crossing over control. Here, we present a genome-wide, high-resolution crossover map for Drosophila santomea and compare it with those of its sister species D. yakuba and the more distantly related D. melanogaster. Upon examining 784 individual meiotic products based on an experimental design that captures intraspecific variation in crossing over control, we identified 2,288 crossovers genome-wide. Our analyses reveal striking differences in crossover patterns between D. santomea and D. yakuba despite their recent split only 400,000 years ago and sharing a significant amount of ancestral polymorphism. The D. santomea X chromosome shows a major reduction in genetic length compared to D. yakuba (62.7 cM vs. 93.8 cM), while autosomes show a slight increase (262.6 vs. 245.6 cM), resulting in overall genetic maps of 324.2 cM for D. santomea and 339.3 cM for D. yakuba. All D. santomea autosomal arms show a significant reduction of the centromere effect relative to D. yakuba, more closely resembling D. melanogaster autosomes. At the same time, estimates of crossover interference indicate weaker intensity across all autosomal arms in D. santomea compared to D. yakuba, while the X chromosome exhibits considerably stronger interference. These findings suggest a link between the intensity of crossover interference and the centromere effect. We propose that stronger crossover interference is associated with a smaller crossover-competent region-determined by the combined centromere and telomere effects-to prevent the deleterious consequences of multiple crossovers occurring too close together. Finally, we examined whether the D. santomea X chromosome exhibits the crossover-associated meiotic drive mechanism (MDCO) reported in D. yakuba, in which chromatids with crossovers are preferentially included in oocytes. Tetrad analysis of the D. santomea X chromosome revealed no evidence of an active MDCO, potentially explaining the reduced crossover rates observed on this chromosome relative to D. yakuba even though the numbers of meiosis I crossovers may be similar in both species.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 25%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Neuroscience 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2025.
All research outputs
#23,136,606
of 34,606,677 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Genetics
#7,448
of 9,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,062
of 358,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Genetics
#46
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,606,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.