| Title |
The use of conspicuity aids by cyclists and risk of crashes involving other road users: a protocol for a population based case-control study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-10-39 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philip D Miller, Denise Kendrick, Carol Coupland, Frank Coffey |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 49 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 24% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Researcher | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 16% |
| Unknown | 7 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 25% |
| Engineering | 5 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 10% |
| Psychology | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 18% |
| Unknown | 10 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#4,358,794
of 25,382,360 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,093
of 17,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,535
of 171,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#19
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,302 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.