↓ Skip to main content

ApicoAMP: The first computational model for identifying apicoplast-targeted transmembrane proteins in Apicomplexa

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Microbiological Methods, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
ApicoAMP: The first computational model for identifying apicoplast-targeted transmembrane proteins in Apicomplexa
Published in
Journal of Microbiological Methods, October 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.mimet.2013.09.017
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Computational identification of apicoplast-targeted proteins is important in drug target determination for diseases such as malaria. While there are established methods for identifying proteins with a bipartite signal in multiple species of Apicomplexa, not all apicoplast-targeted proteins possess this bipartite signature. The publication of recent experimental findings of apicoplast membrane proteins, called transmembrane proteins, that do not possess a bipartite signal has made it feasible to devise a machine learning approach for identifying this new class of apicoplast-targeted proteins computationally.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 6 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 6 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 9%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 6 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2013.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Microbiological Methods
#1,897
of 2,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,380
of 220,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Microbiological Methods
#19
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,350 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.